From Mojo's point of view, the user takes responsibility for payment when using a gadget, with one user having a single account. The gadget is just a trusted intermediary.
This model will doubtless always exist, but needs to be expanded to work with different scenarios:
- A company wants its staff to use a corporate gadget. The company will pay for all use, but wants to deal with staff user management internally.
- A media company wants to promote a new service with a fancy gadget. It will pay a fixed amount of credit that matches the campaign budget. They want to limit any one user to a few calls each.
- A group of friends all want separate user accounts but want to share costs. They also want access to group audits.
No doubt our users will have more to say.